CO129-092 - Acting Governor Mercer - 1863 [4-6] — Page 198

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

193

too much reason to be dissatisfied. On the more objectionable parts of the Attorney General's letter I shall offer no comment, but I think it right to remark that there was no necessity for him to ask to what claim his reference was made, inasmuch as the Claim itself had already formed the subject of question for the Attorney General as to the right to receive Fees for given Professional Advice to a Governmental Department, I may say that I was at first disposed to think this right also inadmissible, for I recollected certain Despatches from the Secretary of State bearing on the subject; viz: Oct. 4 Nr 80 of 14th February 1845, 113 of 27th June 1845, and 149 of 3rd November 1849.

A conversation between himself and an officer of the Government.

The Second case to which I have referred is connected with the Kanagawa Consulate, Japan, and is in all respects similar to that above detailed, except that the Bill has not in this instance been taxed by the Registrar of the Supreme Court.

However on looking further I found a Circular Despatch from Your Grace of the 3rd July 1860 Covering Circular from the Secretary of State for War of which the 304 paragraph seems to justify the Attorney General, and I have caused the officer (the Military Storekeeper) who referred the question to me

Edit History

2026-05-18 23:27:22 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
193 too much reason to be dissatisfied. On the more objectionable parts of the Attorney General's letter I shall offer no comment, but I think it right to remark that there was no necessity for him to ask to what claim his reference was made, inasmuch as the Claim itself had already formed the subject of question for the Attorney General as to the right to receive Fees for given Professional Advice to a Governmental Department, I may say that I was at first disposed to think this right also inadmissible, for I recollected certain Despatches from the Secretary of State bearing on the subject; viz: Oct. 4 Nr 80 of 14th February 1845, 113 of 27th June 1845, and 149 of 3rd November 1849. A conversation between himself and an officer of the Government. The Second case to which I have referred is connected with the Kanagawa Consulate, Japan, and is in all respects similar to that above detailed, except that the Bill has not in this instance been taxed by the Registrar of the Supreme Court. However on looking further I found a Circular Despatch from Your Grace of the 3rd July 1860 Covering Circular from the Secretary of State for War of which the 304 paragraph seems to justify the Attorney General, and I have caused the officer (the Military Storekeeper) who referred the question to me
Baseline (Original)
b. 193 too much reason to be 10. dissatisfied. On the more objectionable parts of the Attorney General's letter I shall offer ne comment, but I think it right to remark that there was no necessity for him to ask to what claim his rele reference was made, inasmuch of as the Claim itself had already formed the subject of for 56 the Attorney General question as to the right 12. On the other of to receive Fees for given nal Advice Professional Department, I may say to a Governmental that I was at first- disposed to think this right also inadmisible, for I recollected certain Despatches from the Secretary of State bearing on the subject; biz: Oct. 4 Nr 80 of 14th February 1845, 113 of 27th June # 3rd November 1849. a enversation between himself. himself, and an -officer of for 32 Mar 45 the Government. Sor. 73 73 The Second case to which I 11. have referred is connected with the Kanagawa and is in all respects Consulate, Japan, similar to that above detailed, except that the Bill has not in this instance been taseed by the Registrar of the Supreme Comt. 9499 1845, and 149 of in my room but thi 13. Suartion thom terned when the fart sthi Tilt Leneral Kalory bene food. chaply from Bon However on looking further I found Fund Le a Cirentar Despatch from Your Grace of th from the Secretary 3rd Wyheith July 1860 Covering Centar of State for War of which the 304 paragraphe Seems to justify the Attorney General, and I have caused the officer (the Military Storchieper) who referred the question to me
2026-05-18 23:27:22 · Baseline
View content

b.

193

too much

reason

to be

10.

dissatisfied.

On the more objectionable parts of the

Attorney General's letter I shall offer ne comment,

but I think it right to remark that there was

no necessity for him to ask to what claim

his rele

reference

was made, inasmuch

of

as the Claim

itself had already formed the subject of

for 56

the Attorney General

question

as to the right

12.

On the other

of

to receive Fees

for

given

nal Advice

Professional Department, I may say

to a Governmental

that I was at first-

disposed to think this right also inadmisible, for I recollected certain Despatches from the Secretary of State bearing on the subject; biz:

Oct. 4 Nr 80 of 14th February 1845, 113 of 27th June

#

3rd November 1849.

a

enversation between himself.

himself, and an

-officer of

for 32

Mar 45

the Government.

Sor. 73 73

The Second case to which I

11.

have referred

is connected with the Kanagawa

and is in all respects

Consulate, Japan,

similar to that above detailed, except that

the Bill has not in this instance been

taseed by the Registrar of the Supreme Comt.

9499

1845, and 149 of

in my room but thi

13.

Suartion thom terned when the fart sthi Tilt Leneral Kalory bene food.

chaply from

Bon

However on looking further I found

Fund Le

a Cirentar Despatch from Your Grace of th

from

the Secretary

3rd

Wyheith July 1860 Covering Centar

of State for War of which the 304 paragraphe Seems to justify the Attorney General, and I have caused the officer (the Military Storchieper) who referred the question to me

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.